Judge Not Satisfied With Google’s Disclosures Over Commenter Pay - bakerdreme1954

The underestimate who oversaw Oracle's suit against Google said Mon that the search giant "has failed to comply" with an August 7 order to render the names of parties whose commentary along the suit may have been influenced by money.

Last week, Google said it had not directly paid anyone to comment along the case, which centered on alleged Java patent and copyright violations in the Humanoid raiseable OS.

However, surrendered factors such as the prevalence of online publishing tools, "any number" of individuals or institutions with "indirect or attenuated" financial ties to Google may suffer written astir the case, accordant to the company.

Google onymous a number of categories into which such parties could fall, much as company contractors, participants in its advertising programs and individuals who work for schools that have received donations from Google. It would be "inordinately problematical and perhaps impossible" for Google to provide the court with full lists of these commenters, the company said.

The wording of Judge William Alsup's August 7 order seemed to incriminate he was most curious in direct pay-for-play activities happening the set forth of Seer and Google: "The Judicature is concerned that the parties and/or counsel herein whitethorn have retained or paid-up impress or net authors, journalists, commentators or bloggers WHO have and/Beaver State may publish comments connected the issues in this case."

But Alsup actually had a broader scope of scenarios in mind, according to his order filed Monday in U.S. District Courtroom for the Blue District of California.

"The August 7 enjoin was not small-scale to authors 'paid . . . to reputation or gossip' or to 'quid professional quo' situations," Alsup wrote in an order filed Mon in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. "Rather, the Order was designed to bring to light authors whose statements about the issues in the case might have been influenced by the receipt of money from Google or Oracle."

"For example, Oracle has disclosed that it retained a blogger as a consultant," Alsup added, referring to Florian Mueller , a frequent commenter on unmistakable and open-source software issues. "Even though the payment was for consulting work, the payment might have influenced the blogger's reports happening issues in the civil action."

Low Deadline

Alsup wants Google to offer further information aside Fri, according to his order on Monday. Oracle mustiness also "supplement its list if this order clarifies whatever payof," Alsup added.

"Google suggests that it has paid indeed many commenters that it will be impossible to list them all," he wrote. "Please simply perform your best but the impossible is not required. Oracle managed to ut it. … Google deman only disclose those commenters that dismiss make up identified after a reasonably hardworking search."

"Google can get laid too by itemisation all commenters familiar aside Google to cause received payments as consultants, contractors, vendors, or employees," Alsup added. Eastern Samoa for organizations receiving money, they indigence non be listed unless one of its employees was a commenter. Gifts to universities bottom be unnoticed."

Also, Google does not postulate to think advertising revenue received by commenters atomic number 3 payment, Alsup said.

In its ain response to Alsup's initial parliamentary law, Vaticinator alleged that Google maintains an extensive mesh of "influencers," among them attorneys, lobbyists, and bloggers, that help further its "highbrow property agenda."

Google brought this meshwork to carry happening the slip in dictate to "help fles public perceptions concerning the positions IT was advocating throughout this trial," Oracle alleged. Prophet too named two "prominent" individuals, Computer and Communication theory Industry Association CEO Ed Unclean and author Jonathan Band, saying they have ties to Google and wrote or so topics germane to the case.

Oracle sued Google in August 2010. The case concluded earlier this year, with Google largely exonerated, but Oracle is planning to invoke.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software system and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris' email address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/460768/judge_not_satisfied_with_googles_disclosures_over_commenter_pay.html

Posted by: bakerdreme1954.blogspot.com

Share this post